清華語言所新023次專題演講公告
講者：Ik-sang Eom (Hanyang University, Seoul)
題目：How and Why Is Korean Similar to Chinese?
日期：2017年2月17日 (星期五)
時間：15:00 開始
地點：人社院 C519教室
摘要：
Except for a small number of foreign loan words, most of which originated from the western languages in recent centuries, the majority of the Korean lexicon consists of indigenous Korean and Sino-Korean words. Sino-Korean words, which constitute over half of the entire lexicon, are of Chinese origin, although some of these words were actually coined by the Japanese or the Koreans. What is interesting is that some seemingly native Korean words are claimed to be closely related with Old Chinese because they are identical or similar. The following are some indigenous Korean words that Zheng-Zhang (2003:133) identifies as similar to Old Chinese:
(1) a. kɯrɯs 器，param 风，kəri 街，kurəng 巷，kara 骑
b. mar 马，kar 葭，khar 枷，sar 梳齿，sarp 臿锸，mir 麦
c. kor 谷，phar 膊, par 箔, sar 腊肉, sir 丝, sur 酒
Additional examples can also be found in Eom (2008:217-240). Native Korean words, spelled using Chinese characters, are similar to Old Chinese:
(2) a. 尔 nə〈 *ɲiei d. 日 nal 〈 nat 〈 *ɲiet
b. 汝 nə 〈 *ɲia e. 人 njən (nom) 〈 *ɲien
c. 而 nə 〈 *ɲiə f．刃 (khal) nal 〈 *ɲien
By the same token, as are cited in Eom (2008:240-260), some characters with Old Chinese velar nasal initial are surprisingly similar with their equivalents in native Korean:
(3) a. 吾 *ŋa 〉na d. 牙 *ŋea 〉(n)i
b. 我 *ŋa 〉na e. 顔 *ŋean 〉nat
c. 眼 *ŋeən 〉nun
Why are some indigenous Korean words similar to Old Chinese? There may be two possible reasons: they are either cognates or the result of language contact. Oh (2005) and Pan (2006) claim that both of them originated from the same source. That means Chinese and Korean are genetically related such that similar words in these two languages are cognates, or Han-Han tongyuanci 韓漢同源詞 in Chinese. These scholars even propose that Tungusic languages share the same origin with the Sinitic languages. On the other hand, Hou (2006, 2009) regards them as loan words. To her, they are Han-Han duiyingci 韓漢對應詞 or jieci 借詞. This paper examines these two possibilities closely and concludes that they are not cognates but loan words. In addition, the paper also addresses the question of why Korean is similar to Chinese in terms of typology, as is discussed in Eom (2017).
References
Eom, Ik-sang. 2008. Hanguk Hanjaeum Jungguk sigeuro bogi (Sino-Korean Phonology from a Chinese linguistic Perspective) [in Korean] Seoul: Hanguk munhwasa.
Eom, Ik-sang. 2017. “Chinese and Korean.” Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, volume 1. Pp.376-385. Sybesma, Rint ed. Leiden: Brill.
Hou, Lingwen. 2009. Shangu Hanyu Chaoxian yu duiyingci yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
Oh, Sejun. 2005. “Lun Han-Aertai yu zhun tongyuanci.” Jungeo Jungmunhak, 36:1-25.
Pan, Wuyun. 2006. “Chaoxian yu zhong de shanggu Hanyu jieci.” Minzu yuwen, 1:3-10.
Zheng-Zhang, Shangfang. 2003. Shanggu yinxi. Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.
題目：How and Why Is Korean Similar to Chinese?
日期：2017年2月17日 (星期五)
時間：15:00 開始
地點：人社院 C519教室
摘要：
Except for a small number of foreign loan words, most of which originated from the western languages in recent centuries, the majority of the Korean lexicon consists of indigenous Korean and Sino-Korean words. Sino-Korean words, which constitute over half of the entire lexicon, are of Chinese origin, although some of these words were actually coined by the Japanese or the Koreans. What is interesting is that some seemingly native Korean words are claimed to be closely related with Old Chinese because they are identical or similar. The following are some indigenous Korean words that Zheng-Zhang (2003:133) identifies as similar to Old Chinese:
(1) a. kɯrɯs 器，param 风，kəri 街，kurəng 巷，kara 骑
b. mar 马，kar 葭，khar 枷，sar 梳齿，sarp 臿锸，mir 麦
c. kor 谷，phar 膊, par 箔, sar 腊肉, sir 丝, sur 酒
Additional examples can also be found in Eom (2008:217-240). Native Korean words, spelled using Chinese characters, are similar to Old Chinese:
(2) a. 尔 nə〈 *ɲiei d. 日 nal 〈 nat 〈 *ɲiet
b. 汝 nə 〈 *ɲia e. 人 njən (nom) 〈 *ɲien
c. 而 nə 〈 *ɲiə f．刃 (khal) nal 〈 *ɲien
By the same token, as are cited in Eom (2008:240-260), some characters with Old Chinese velar nasal initial are surprisingly similar with their equivalents in native Korean:
(3) a. 吾 *ŋa 〉na d. 牙 *ŋea 〉(n)i
b. 我 *ŋa 〉na e. 顔 *ŋean 〉nat
c. 眼 *ŋeən 〉nun
Why are some indigenous Korean words similar to Old Chinese? There may be two possible reasons: they are either cognates or the result of language contact. Oh (2005) and Pan (2006) claim that both of them originated from the same source. That means Chinese and Korean are genetically related such that similar words in these two languages are cognates, or Han-Han tongyuanci 韓漢同源詞 in Chinese. These scholars even propose that Tungusic languages share the same origin with the Sinitic languages. On the other hand, Hou (2006, 2009) regards them as loan words. To her, they are Han-Han duiyingci 韓漢對應詞 or jieci 借詞. This paper examines these two possibilities closely and concludes that they are not cognates but loan words. In addition, the paper also addresses the question of why Korean is similar to Chinese in terms of typology, as is discussed in Eom (2017).
References
Eom, Ik-sang. 2008. Hanguk Hanjaeum Jungguk sigeuro bogi (Sino-Korean Phonology from a Chinese linguistic Perspective) [in Korean] Seoul: Hanguk munhwasa.
Eom, Ik-sang. 2017. “Chinese and Korean.” Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, volume 1. Pp.376-385. Sybesma, Rint ed. Leiden: Brill.
Hou, Lingwen. 2009. Shangu Hanyu Chaoxian yu duiyingci yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
Oh, Sejun. 2005. “Lun Han-Aertai yu zhun tongyuanci.” Jungeo Jungmunhak, 36:1-25.
Pan, Wuyun. 2006. “Chaoxian yu zhong de shanggu Hanyu jieci.” Minzu yuwen, 1:3-10.
Zheng-Zhang, Shangfang. 2003. Shanggu yinxi. Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.